16.03.2012 - 00:02
Ok, I know you guys aren't going for realism but seriously, your spending all this time working on rare units, but no one really cares about the rare units. Some rare units like mercenaries and Exo-infantry should stay the way they are as rare units, but come on, anti-tank infantry and nukes? WHY CAN'T WE FREAKING HAVE THAT STUFF TO BEGIN WITH?!?! Yes I know, some are you are gonna be like " But some guy is gonna nuke me alot and your idiot is terrible trollloloolololololol!" But I'm not planning anything But Seriously, there should be an option that lets you have games without nukes (The ones we play now) and with nukes ( M to the A to the D) . Also when you nuke a city, half of its income percent should be destroyed, and regained a a normal rate. There are tons of of forums about nuclear subs, and basically you should get 2 nuclear reinforcements every reinforcements turn, and they should only be short range. The cub should also be stealth and all nukes inside it should be stealth until detected. After all we don't handle things lightly in the USA One last thing, stealth should be rare units and fighters should be base. I doubt you'll even look at this without deleting it, and I even more doubt you'll actually take my suggestions, But trust me I'd be a great hapinin' if you'd do this, I think we all agree, plus, you know you want to
---- Roses are red Violets are blue In Soviet Russia Poems right you! Roses are grey Violets are grey I'm color blind Roses are red I have a phone Nobody calls me Forever alone Roses are red Violets are blue Some poems rhyme this one doesn't
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
17.03.2012 - 11:10
BUT STEALTH ARE SUPER ANNOYING Id rather have a super powerful unit i can see than a not-so-power unit I don't have any idea where it is, plus, why can't we just have them both Ivan and Amok?
---- Roses are red Violets are blue In Soviet Russia Poems right you! Roses are grey Violets are grey I'm color blind Roses are red I have a phone Nobody calls me Forever alone Roses are red Violets are blue Some poems rhyme this one doesn't
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
17.03.2012 - 11:28
Good idea, but yes as you've mentioned, it should only be special games where rare units like exo-infantry, nukes etc are used.
---- Don't trust the manipulative rabbit.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
19.03.2012 - 04:48
Yes, we might eventually add a new game option that will allow you to build nukes and some other rare stuff.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
19.03.2012 - 14:40
do not want, all the noobs will use this, and it will be totally unbalanced. well unless it's premium, and they they won't be able to play it haha
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
19.03.2012 - 14:46
The game is unbalanced for new players as-is, giving them a fighting chance would be nice.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
23.03.2012 - 16:02
Yes but Everyone Will Have NUKES!
---- Roses are red Violets are blue In Soviet Russia Poems right you! Roses are grey Violets are grey I'm color blind Roses are red I have a phone Nobody calls me Forever alone Roses are red Violets are blue Some poems rhyme this one doesn't
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
23.03.2012 - 18:50
What about creating a strategy dedicated to nuclear combat. It would have to involve massive production at the expense of building tanks and infantry. Perhaps a counter system where you can allocate points to build an infantry or w/e or to go towards a nuke. Once you have say, 15 you can get a tactical nuke. If you save up 50, you can get a medium range missile, and if you save up 100 you can get an ICBM. There would be safeguards like announcing a player has acquired certain technologies. Additionally there would have to be either an offensive nerf or a price increase to all regular units (except subs and air transports for carrying nukes). Those numbers are totally negotiable, this is just a rough idea after all. I've been thinking about this for a while, even though I haven't played much lately lol. Of course things like population casualties and the like would have to be implemented first, but I think making nukes available as a strategy would be the sensible way to handle it. See how people use them, and maybe later introduce the tactical nuke as an SP purchase to all. I would envision people using tactical nukes in addition to regular forces, launching them from subs to clear washington DC or dropping them from air transports to clear Moscow. Or someone who is isolated taking a few cash cow countries then saving up for those ICBMs to decimate his opponent on the other side of the world. Late game, we could see some of the worst nightmare scenarios from the cold war as Russia launches its arsenal at the US while launching a ground invasion of western Europe.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
24.03.2012 - 08:26
1. You should be able to buy nukes with out having to buy a facility 2.Nukes should only be avalible in games with nukes 3. Nukes in nuke games should cost like 1000, so you can make a massive nuclear army
---- Roses are red Violets are blue In Soviet Russia Poems right you! Roses are grey Violets are grey I'm color blind Roses are red I have a phone Nobody calls me Forever alone Roses are red Violets are blue Some poems rhyme this one doesn't
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
24.03.2012 - 12:58
Yes but still, dont be a dipwad, dont just let rich countries chuck nukes at eachother
---- Roses are red Violets are blue In Soviet Russia Poems right you! Roses are grey Violets are grey I'm color blind Roses are red I have a phone Nobody calls me Forever alone Roses are red Violets are blue Some poems rhyme this one doesn't
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
24.03.2012 - 13:05
It seems that you people expect nukes to be generally expensive- why? As rare units. they're pretty much useless, seeing as they usually get killed in the battle before they attack.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
24.03.2012 - 13:13
...or you could just give nukes 999 atk and 999 def, make them cost 999, make a building time of 3 turns, and call it a day.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
24.03.2012 - 13:33
Err, last time I checked, Nuclear weapons ARE OP.
Laden...
Laden...
|
Weet je het zeker?