Montenegrin admiral who refused to attack Dalmatian cities by suicide

Montenegrin President Filip Vujanovic today, on the occasion of today's National Day of Montenegro, posthumously awarded with the Medal of Valor Admiral of former Yugoslav Army - Vladimir Barovic, who, during the war and Yugoslav aggression on Croatia, refused to give the order to fire on the coastal and Dalmatian cities and committed suicide.

- "He was an Admiral who did not want to give the order to destroy the Dalmatian towns and villages in Croatia, to kill innocent people, he realized that his Montenegrin ethics and values ​​do not allow him to destroy innocent", said Montenegrin President Vujanovic






He was commander of the Yugoslav Naval-Army located in Istria (Croatia). At that time, he stayed remembered for his honorable conduct and declare:
- 'There will be no destruction while I'm in command, and if I'm still going to be forced to do the destruction of Croatian Pula and Istria, then there will be no me.'

Few days later, in the evening hours in the building of Naval-Army clinic on the island of Vis he committed suicide shot in the temple and left a note in which, among other things, says that he decided to die with honor 'because he did not want to wage war against brotherly Croatian people'. For the reason of his suicide, he stated the reason of Yugoslav aggression on Croatia which for him constituted an act contrary to the Montenegrin honor, 'because the Montenegrins can not fight and destroy people who did nothing wrong to them'.
As the reason of suicide he also states the inability to prevent Yugoslav attacks on Croatia, also his disagreement with the command of Yugoslav Army. He committed suicide at same day he took over as Chief of Staff of the Naval District, which meant that he agreed to listen the orders for combat actions against Croatian citizens, and Barovic's military and national honor didn't let him to accept that, as he said in suicide note.


Today, the majority of Montenegrins agree that Vladimir Barovic was a true Montenegrin and a real mirror of humanity, not like some individuals from Montenegro who call themselves Montenegrins and in fact they are just Serbian vassals who actually were the main mongers and advocates of the Yugoslav aggression on South Croatia, especially on the city called Dubrovnik, which is today one of the most beautiful cities in the world.




Dubrovnik during Yugoslav aggression:









Dubrovnik today:

Me then:








Me now:

Geschreven door Al Fappino, 13.07.2016 at 14:07

Me then:




Me now:

Beautiful city

What is this, Balkan topics week?

By the way, i see West taught you well. 'Yugoslav aggression on Croatia', 'Independence War'. American style since 1775

1. There was no Croatia back then, it was Federal Yugoslavia with Socialist Republic of Croatia within.

2. Croatia wanted to secede from Yugoslavia, starting war to achieve so. Which mean it was Croatian aggression on Yugoslavia.

3. Dubrovnik had 1,000-5,000 terrorists dangerously close to Montenegro and civilians, they could blowup themselves or spill into Montenegro anytime. Army & Navy had to intervene and destroy them.



Anyway, i don't have anything against group of people achieving independence. But i draw the line when they ethnically cleanse 500,000 (12% of population) people just because they are of 'different religion, nationality and language'. Especially so if they are naturally in that territory not any younger than 'original' population aka same people.


But keep forcing yourself to believe the lies, if that makes you feel better. You are harming yourself that way, not others.

OMG, this time i cannot agree with both croat and Tito.
Croat, its not "Yugoslav aggression on Croatia", its is "Croatian Rebellion War"
Tito, its not 500 000, its is 240 000..... tito numbers

Geschreven door Oleg, 13.07.2016 at 16:10

Tito, its not 500 000, its is 240 000..... tito numbers

I thought he was talking about 550.000 Croatian refuges...

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 16:01

1. There was no Croatia back then, it was Federal Yugoslavia with Socialist Republic of Croatia within.
2. Croatia wanted to secede from Yugoslavia, starting war to achieve so. Which mean it was Croatian aggression on Yugoslavia.

A non existing country attacked another country...

Ah im bored with this discussion,lets talk about Donetsk and Lugansk terrorists agression on Ukraine instead...

Geschreven door Oleg, 13.07.2016 at 16:10

OMG, this time i cannot agree with both croat and Tito.
Croat, its not "Yugoslav aggression on Croatia", its is "Croatian Rebellion War"
Tito, its not 500 000, its is 240 000..... tito numbers

Alright, i made mistake for 120,000, it's 380,000, not 500,000

10 years later, 15,000 more people less.

Geschreven door Goblin, 13.07.2016 at 16:55

A non existing country attacked another country...

Exactly, it is so confusing. Croatia didn't exist, it was Yugoslavia, even the UN, USA and the rest of the world recognized that country and had relations with. And then Croatia arrive on world map and suddenly it is Yugoslavia who invade Croatia and not vice versa. Even as Croatia started to take Yugoslav territory to create a country, carve the land.

Since you edited your post, want to talk about Donetsk, i'll add:

20 years later a heinous act of hypocricy happens when Donetsk try to get sovereignity from Ukraine, Ukraine send troops and suddenly it is Donetsk fault, they are terrorists and not Ukraine. I mean cmon, decide already, who's the bad guy, the government or rebel region. Stop changing rules everytime it is against your goal.

Oohhh poor Croatia :( Would you like a blanket to warm you up? :( Hot chocolate to calm you down?

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:05

Even as Croatia started to take Yugoslav territory to create a country, carve the land.

You do know that Republic of Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska warent part of Yugoslavia either right... damn terrorists, but i wonder why Yugoslavia didnt attack them

Geschreven door Goblin, 13.07.2016 at 17:09

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:05

Even as Croatia started to take Yugoslav territory to create a country, carve the land.

You do know that Republic of Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska warent part of Yugoslavia either right... damn terrorists, but i wonder why Yugoslavia didnt attack them

I am pro-Yugoslavia because i am pro-status quo, so i am against Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska as well against independent Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia or Liberland.. (for 1991)

Yugoslavia could not attack them becaues it ceased to exist in 1992. Croatia seceded in 1991 so Yugoslavia fought back. Later is was Serbia and Montenegro and i don't know their policies, involvement or goals.

The only legal entity on territory of Yugoslavia was Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Everything else was false and illegal. Only legal army according to UN and recognized by the World was Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), everything else was (nationalist)paramilitaries and terrorists.

Geschreven door Goblin, 13.07.2016 at 16:55

Ah im bored with this discussion,lets talk about Donetsk and Lugansk terrorists agression on Ukraine instead...

thats boring too.

Geschreven door Your Laki, 13.07.2016 at 17:08

Oohhh poor Croatia :( Would you like a blanket to warm you up? :( Hot chocolate to calm you down?

I'd have their President anytime tho

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:12

i am against Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska as well against independent Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia or Liberland.. (for 1991)
Yugoslavia could not attack them becaues it ceased to exist in 1992. Croatia seceded in 1991 so Yugoslavia fought back.

Serbian Krajina was formed in 1991. ...even more, Serbs declared authonomy in 1990.

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:05

I mean cmon, decide already, who's the bad guy, the government or rebel region. Stop changing rules everytime it is against your goal.

Edit: actually what rules and why the hell not?... should an agressor be determined by a sheer status... life is more then one scenario ffs with a possibility that both sides are cunts, but firstly one should know the difference between rebels, freedom fighters and terrorists perhapse

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:12

I am pro-Yugoslavia because i am pro-status quo, so i am against Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska as well against independent Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia or Liberland.. (for 1991)

Oh, yes?
How about this:

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:12

Russia lost 5 million square kilometers, Serbia lost 100,000 km/2

Your point was on Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska.
I am sick of your biased shit comments posted on this forum how the wind blows. You're lost in your own lies and I what's more tragicomic, there are people who still trust you. How 'bout buying that Desert Eagle and suiciding?


PS. Goblin explained enough
PS #2: What is km/2? Half kilometers? Serbia lost 50,000 kms?

Boring thread

Geschreven door Guest, 13.07.2016 at 18:59

Boring thread

sorry terrorist, we should talk about quran talking about killing people.

Geschreven door Oleg, 13.07.2016 at 19:04

Geschreven door Guest, 13.07.2016 at 18:59

Boring thread

sorry terrorist

hahahahahahahahahhahahaha idk why, but this was funny even Pavle said it

Geschreven door Oleg, 13.07.2016 at 19:04

Geschreven door Guest, 13.07.2016 at 18:59

Boring thread

sorry terrorist, we should talk about quran talking about killing people.

Yeah start talking you will cry in the end

Geschreven door Guest, 13.07.2016 at 19:08

Geschreven door Oleg, 13.07.2016 at 19:04

Geschreven door Guest, 13.07.2016 at 18:59

Boring thread

sorry terrorist, we should talk about quran talking about killing people.

Yeah start talking you will cry in the end

what if i already cry

Geschreven door Croat, 13.07.2016 at 18:52

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:12

I am pro-Yugoslavia because i am pro-status quo, so i am against Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska as well against independent Croatia, Bosnia, Slovenia or Liberland.. (for 1991)

Oh, yes?
How about this:

Geschreven door Skanderbeg, 13.07.2016 at 17:12

Russia lost 5 million square kilometers, Serbia lost 100,000 km/2

Your point was on Serbian Krajina and Republic of Srpska.
I am sick of your biased shit comments posted on this forum how the wind blows. You're lost in your own lies and I what's more tragicomic, there are people who still trust you. How 'bout buying that Desert Eagle and suiciding?


PS. Goblin explained enough
PS #2: What is km/2? Half kilometers? Serbia lost 50,000 kms?

I think McDonalds fries are better than Starbucks coffee because your post make so much sense.