18.01.2018 - 14:41
1. USA singlehandedly won ww2 againsts the nazies. We turned the tide and we are the true heroes of ww2. Stop spreading your fake news about how you did anything more than die in the trenches in russia. 2. Stop with your communism already, it isn't working. You can't live your entire life getting hand-outs and welfare from Stalin and Putin. Seriously stop with the fake news on the forum already.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 14:55
The battle of Stalingrad turned the tide of ww2.. before that nazies didn't know defeat.
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 15:03
No it didnt you little fake news spreader. USA could have easily mobilized their massive manpower and won even without stalingrad.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 15:07
but they didn't. the could have part means a lot ![]()
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 15:11
Soviet only had to fight a 1 front war. Eezy perzy especially with free supplies from west. American had to carry them the entire way
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Deleted User 299415 Account verwijderd |
18.01.2018 - 15:19
Lets be real,If USA didnt join the war europe would die,On the other hand if Soviet stayed in defensive pact and usa joined war nazis would lose.Massive production,Massive manpower....the only thing missing was experience but you gain it by losing some million men.
---- ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 16:25
Witch-Gay butthurt Trump won so he repeats Hillary propaganda, pff typical. 'Poohtin stole muh lections' Go pick oranges, soon no more foodstamps for you.
---- If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 16:58
Italian citizens asking American GI's for food. circa 1944 Colorized
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 17:02
If i remember correctly Germany has deployed only 15 percent of its troops in the western front. Also not much left of it anyways after losing so many soldiers equipment resources and ofcourse moral in the eastern front. Its true that Stalin was heavily funded but if he lost Us would need to accept with German Europe or fight for decades. Anyways even though America funded alot eventually it earned from it more than anyone.
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 17:04
And yes I know that thread is not ment for serious debating but for rage and flame. But its hard to chabge an hobby
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 17:38
Well, just saying but USA did supply the Soviet Union via the White Sea and Murmansk, as written in Churchill's diaries, so USA did keep USSR afloat
---- ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:26
Stop getting handouts from putin. Dont make us nuke you commies.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:33
gotta disagree with you here. germans mistake was breaking the pact with russia and attacking it. they thought they had it easy ,which it was in beggining, but russians fought with heart for their freedom so i respect that. also one of reasons germans lost east front was that they were running low on supplies especially fuel and to send that east would take a long time. also one of their makn armies got surrounded without food and water and had to surrender on cold winter. if germans would be smart they wouldnt attack russia. with the army they sent east, they couldve conquer england twice and rule europe. also usa got into war when they saw that russians were going into offensive and when no nazi was able to set foot in england. if usa wouldve gotten in war in beggining, germans wouldnt attack russia obviously, they would focus all west. as for heroes, i gotta givr that medal to those who went in war in group of 2 where 1 had a gun and other hand ammos since there wasnt gun for everyone. thats what russian people did for their freedom. so did albanians in the mountains fighting nazis also dont get me wrong im not doing this to defend andartes or his ideokogies, its just my personal opinion based on history knowledge i have.
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:40
Imagine if the US stayed neutral. No lend lease, no anything. Europe would be full of axis members and russia would collapse. USA was the only reason the german felt a need to rush the invasion of russia. Without the threat of a superpower joining, they could have taken their sweet ass time grinding every last russian to bone powder.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:41
People said that It was matter of time before Russia attacks because Stalin had life goal to conquer Europe. However We better wait for Acquiescence reply about it if it ever comes
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:51
"people say..." those words are the reason why people really study history. both of us know what you just said is purely coming from you not from any REAL historical fact
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:52
i agree usa played a big role into defeating ger, but lets not forget it was long after russians went into offensive and they were pushing every german back. germans were finished at that point .
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:52
Another possible motive could be keep the fire on. Agreement with Britian could end the war for Germany and I dont think thats what the Nazis wanted
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 18:57
I would totally agree with you if it was rumor or a guess but its more than that. Beside I did not spend all my days on it like historians and nonexpert but i still bought and downloaded books to learn some history. Some of my knowledge does come from the internet and not from the university but when Im wrong I am being corrected
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:05
yeA? more than that? please, do tell us
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:05
you told me " people say...."... if thats what you learned from alm those books you downloaded then stop reading troll books
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:18
Oh I see what you mean. Point is its not just one historian assumption or common opinion but an historical fact that the cummunists tried to spread their revolution. Addidtionally one of the reasons people accepted Hitler as valiadate candidate or relevant was because he promoted himself as protector against the communist threat. Furthermore in order to win elections he burned the reichstang and blamed the communist party. In order to justify his violence against minorities he blamed them for standing behind and spreading communism. That is also one of the reasons he enjoyed support of industrials and tycoons. After losing all their invenstment in Russia even French elitists supported him. In summarise the panic about the communist threat was so big and served him so well it even was one of the execuses to start the war in Europe at all.
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:21
I will be back tomorrow evening if there will be any more replies for me. Please be patient.
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:26
Do I, for the first time of my life, agree with Commando? I don't know who is worse, Tito or WD?
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 19:49
You got into the match as a substitute in 85th minute and you have balls of saying you won it by yourself, and also brag about running faster than your teammate on the right wing. *clap clap*
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 20:12
Now delete your post, I didn't even read all posts that CE made here, just first one, and I like it.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 20:28
Done. Duel?
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
18.01.2018 - 20:32
Also Pavle its not easy to say because you are my friend but you are being too easily convinced with your anti american and pro russian obsession. Relieve your mind bro
---- ![]() ![]()
Laden...
Laden...
|
Weet je het zeker?