|
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
Garde Berichten: 2842 Van: Canada
|
Ofc, shouldn't have left to begin with.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door boywind2, 29.03.2019 at 02:46
Geschreven door PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03
Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.
it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol
Yea probably best to buff those sentries. But everyone only wants it because the infantry units are OP, not because the sentries had anything to do with it.
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Yes, it fit right in perfectly with the other strats.
Unlike the abomination of a strat that was inssurection.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Bring back ci with a new name D
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
Garde Berichten: 2842 Van: Canada
|
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Just name it something else
Laden...
Laden...
|
Garde Berichten: 2842 Van: Canada
|
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
Garde Berichten: 2842 Van: Canada
|
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:41
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.
Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again
t. egg
But haha, probably. CI is a fine name either way, and I can understand some people's confusion. Insurgency is merely referring to tactical insurgency and the point of CI is to uncover any insurgent scheming and deal with it... by smashing sentries into it.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Definitely agree, the strategy was something nice and new that actually fit in. It countered some strategies while also was able to get countered, which i think is the perfect balance- I honestly don't know why it was taken away, but hopefully we see it returning soon.
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Personally, I just want new stuff, regardless if it's shit or not. So I voted yes.
----
*War in Europe again isn't good for anyone... that's why the EU Needs to Evoke and Become the EEC once more, as an International, Nationalist Union Long Live The Realms! Long Live the Europeans!*
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
I thought this was a troll strat (and I didn't test it) and a troll post so it seems it's a good strat
----
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25
Geschreven door Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12
Geschreven door Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21
Bring back ci with a new name D
Why a new name?
Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz
ITS COUNTER INSURGENCY
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
some gay haters who dont give 2 shits probably
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Yes. It only needs a minor patch for the strat to be solid.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
Me
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Geschreven door Nations, 30.03.2019 at 01:21
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
Me
Any reason why?
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed
edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?
theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed
edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50
whos alts were they
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Counter-Insurgency needs to come back into the game, but with PD tanks instead of normal tanks. That's really all the strat really needs for balance. Also, MAYBE give just the infantry a +2 defense bonus against marines instead of a +1, since they'd really just have PD defense against marines otherwise.
Laden...
Laden...
|
NewTea Berichten: 188 Van: Canada
|
When was this ever a thing? I don't ever remember it being an option.
----
Planet Howdy Prison = 152/89.
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Zzzz 45no. Cl was a nice strat bla
----
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
Bring it back, but with weaker tanks and stronger sentries.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Laden...
Laden...
|
|
The masses has spoken. This is what was asked all those years with strat changes by the "elite". Now the same "elite" try to force it but aint happening. Good thing after all those years they got karma.
----
Laden...
Laden...
|